Preface |
|
xiii | |
Acronyms |
|
xvii | |
|
|
1 | (28) |
|
Distinguish Randomized and Observational Studies |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
Understand Omnibus Quantities |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Independence, Equal Variance, and Normality |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
Models As Simple As Possible, But Not More Simple |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Do Not Multiply Probabilities More Than Necessary |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Know the Sample Space for Statements of Risk |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
p-Values for Sample Size, Confidence Intervals for Results |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Use at Least Twelve Observations in Constructing a Confidence Interval |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Know the Unit of the Variable |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Know Properties Preserved When Transforming Units |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
Be Flexible About Scale of Measurement Determining Analysis |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Be Eclectic and Ecumenical in Inference |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Consider Bootstrapping for Complex Relationships |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Standard Error from Sample Range/Sample Size |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
29 | (24) |
|
Begin with a Basic Formula for Sample Size |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
No Finite Population Correction for Survey Sample Size |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
Calculating Sample Size Using the Coefficient of Variation |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Do Not Formulate a Study Solely in Terms of Effect Size |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Overlapping Confidence Intervals Do Not Imply Nonsignificance |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Sample Size Calculation for the Poisson Distribution |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Sample Size for Poisson With Background Rate |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Sample Size Calculation for the Binomial Distribution |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
When Unequal Sample Sizes Matter; When They Don't |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Sample Size With Different Costs for the Two Samples |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
The Rule of Threes for 95% Upper Bounds When There Are No Events |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Sample Size Calculations Are Determined by the Analysis |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
|
53 | (22) |
|
Assessing and Describing Covariation |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Don't Summarize Regression Sampling Schemes with Correlation |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
Do Not Correlate Rates or Ratios Indiscriminately |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Determining Sample Size to Estimate a Correlation |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Pairing Data is not Always Good |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
Go Beyond Correlation in Drawing Conclusions |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
Agreement As Accuracy, Scale. Differential, and Precision |
|
|
65 | (3) |
|
Assess Test Reliability by Means of Agreement |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
Range of the Predictor Variable and Regression |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
Measuring Change: Width More Important than Numbers |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
|
75 | (28) |
|
Start with the Poisson to Model Incidence or Prevalence |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
The Odds Ratio Approximates the Relative Risk Assuming the Disease is Rare |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
The Number of Events is Crucial in Estimating Sample Sizes |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
Using a Logarithmic Formulation to Calculate Sample Size |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Take No More than Four or Five Controls per Case |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Obtain at Least Ten Subjects for Every Variable Investigated |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
Begin with the Exponential Distribution to Model Time to Event |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
Begin with Two Exponentials for Comparing Survival Times |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
Prevalence Dominates in Screening Rare Diseases |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
I Do Not Dichotomize Unless Absolutely Necessary |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Select an Additive or Multiplicative Model on the Basis of Mechanism of Action |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
|
103 | (26) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Begin with the Lognormal Distribution in Environmental Studies |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
Differences Are More Symmetrical |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
Beware of Pseudoreplication |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Think Beyond Simple Random Sampling |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
Consider the Size of the Population Affected by Small Effects |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Statistical Models of Small Effects Are Very Sensitive to Assumptions |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Distinguish Between Variability and Uncertainty |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
Description of the Database is As Important as Its Data |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Always Assess the Statistical Basis for an Environmental Standard |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Measurement of a Standard and Policy |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
Parametric Analyses Make Maximum Use of the Data |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Distinguish Between Confidence, Prediction, and Tolerance Intervals |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
Statistics Plays a Key Role in Risk Assessment, Less in Risk Management |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
Exposure Assessment is the Weak Link in Assessing Health Effects of Pollutants |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Assess the Errors in Calibration Due to Inverse Regression |
|
|
125 | (4) |
|
Design, Conduct, and Analysis |
|
|
129 | (24) |
|
Randomization Puts Systematic Effects into the Error Term |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
Blocking is the Key to Reducing Variability |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Factorial Designs Should be Used to Assess Joint Effects of Variables |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
High-Order Interactions Occur Rarely |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
Balanced Designs Allow Easy Assessment of Joint Effects |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Plan to Graph the Results of an Analysis |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
Distinguish Between Design Structure and Treatment Structure |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Make Hierarchical Analyses the Default Analysis |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Distinguish Between Nested and Crossed Designs-Not Always Easy |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (3) |
|
Address Multiple Comparisons Before Starting the Study |
|
|
149 | (4) |
|
Words, Tables, and Graphs |
|
|
153 | (22) |
|
Use Text for a Few Numbers, Tables for Many Numbers, Graphs for Complex Relationships |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
Arrange Information in a Table to Drive Home the Message |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
Bargraphs Waste Ink; They Don't Illuminate Complex Relationships |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Stacked Bargraphs Are Worse Than Bargraphs |
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
Three-Dimensional Bargraphs Constitute Misdirected Artistry |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Identify Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Patterns in Longitudinal Data |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
Use Rendering, Manipulation, and Linking in High Dimensional Data |
|
|
170 | (5) |
|
|
175 | (18) |
|
Structure a Consultation Session to Have a Beginning a Middle, and an End |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
Know Yourself, Know the Investigator |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Tailor Advice to the Level of the Investigator |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Use Units the Investigator is Comfortable With |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
Agree on Assignment of Responsibilities |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Any Basic Statistical Computing Package Will Do |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Ethics Precedes, Guides, and Follows Consultation |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Be Proactive in Statistical Consulting |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
Use the Web for Reference, Resource, and Education |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Listen to, and Heed the Advice of Experts in the Field |
|
|
190 | (3) |
Epilogue |
|
193 | (2) |
References |
|
195 | (12) |
Author Index |
|
207 | (4) |
Topic Index |
|
211 | |